Será que Newton estava realmente errado sobre a lei da gravidade???

O fato, Fato, FATO da evolução era, até recentemente, defendida com o seguinte clichê: A evolução é um fato cientificamente comprovado assim como a lei da gravidade.

Eu costumava responder à Galera dos meninos e meninas de Darwin, que pela lei da gravidade de Newton era possível predizer onde os planetas vão estar daqui a xyz anos, mas que a teoria da evolução não era capaz de predizer quando e como se daria a evolução em nanosegundos! Nem em bactérias!

Agora pesquisadores europeus estão entretendo a possibilidade de que Newton estava errado a respeito da gravidade. Catatau, mano, se Newton estiver errado sobre a gravidade, a Galera dos meninos e meninas de Darwin vai ter que arranjar outro clichê para o fato, Fato, FATO da evolução ser um fato tão cientificamente estabelecido quanto outra lei de ciências duras como a física.

Você sabia? A teoria da evolução não tem leis, mas apenas um princípio: a seleção natural, e esta parece que nunca foi assim uma Brastemp na criação (Argh, isso é como cometer assassinato epistêmico...) de novidades bióticas??? E que a nova teoria da evolução - a SÍNTESE EVOLUTIVA AMPLIADA irá relegar a seleção natural a um papel mais secundário? Aguardem 2010!!!

Só pra contrariar, é bem capaz que a Nomenklatura científica 'endureça' ainda mais o papel deste mecanismo evolutivo. Apesar das evidências contrariando esta onipresença, onipotência e onicompetência da seleção natural. Quem viver, verá...

O mais engraçado em tudo isso, é que eu nunca vi um físico afirmar que as leis da física são fatos, Fatos, FATOS científicos devidamente comprovadas assim como a hipótese do ancestral comum...

Sorry, periferia, mas este doutorando em História da Ciência vai deixar o texto em inglês.

+++++

Study plunges standard Theory of Cosmology into Crisis
May 5th, 2009

As modern cosmologists rely more and more on the ominous “dark matter” to explain otherwise inexplicable observations, much effort has gone into the detection of this mysterious substance in the last two decades, yet no direct proof could be found that it actually exists. Even if it does exist, dark matter would be unable to reconcile all the current discrepancies between actual measurements and predictions based on theoretical models. Hence the number of physicists questioning the existence of dark matter has been increasing for some time now.

Cosmos of Life's Creation - www.lavonn.net
Life Recreate the Universe Dark Matter is Life Structures

Competing theories of gravitation have already been developed which are independent of this construction. Their only problem is that they conflict with Newton’s theory of gravitation.

“Maybe Newton was indeed wrong”, declares Professor Dr. Pavel Kroupa of Bonn University's Argelander-Institut für Astronomie (AIfA). “Although his theory does, in fact, describe the everyday effects of gravity on Earth, things we can see and measure, it is conceivable that we have completely failed to comprehend the actual physics underlying the force of gravity”.

This is a problematical hypothesis that has nevertheless gained increasing ground in recent years, especially in Europe.

Two new studies could well lend further support to it. In these studies, Professor Kroupa and his former colleague Dr. Manuel Metz, working in collaboration with Professor Dr. Gerhard Hensler and Dr. Christian Theis from the University of Vienna, and Dr. Helmut Jerjen from the Australian National University, Canberra, have examined so-called “satellite galaxies”. This term is used for dwarf galaxy companions of the Milky Way, some of which contain only a few thousand stars.

According to the best cosmological models, they exist presumably in hundreds around most of the major galaxies. Up to now, however, only 30 such satellites have been observed around the Milky Way, a discrepancy in numbers which is commonly attributed to the fact that the light emitted from the majority of satellite galaxies is so faint they remain invisible.

A detailed study of these stellar agglomerates has revealed some astonishing phenomena: “First of all, there is something unusual about their distribution”, Professor Kroupa explains, “the satellites should be uniformly arranged around their mother galaxy, but this is not what we found“. More precisely, all classical satellites of the Milky Way - the eleven brightest dwarf galaxies - lie more or less in the same plane, they are forming some sort of a disc in the sky. The research team has also been able to show that most of these satellite galaxies rotate in the same direction around the Milky Way - like the planets revolve around the Sun.

Contradiction upon Contradiction

The physicists do belief that this phenomenon can only be explained if the satellites were created a long time ago through collisions between younger galaxies. “The fragments produced by such an event can form rotating dwarf galaxies”, explains Dr. Metz, who has recently moved across to the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (German Aero-space Center). But there is an interesting catch to this crash theory, “theoretical calculations tell us that the satellites created cannot contain any dark matter”. This assumption, however, stands in contradiction to another observation. “The stars in the satellites we have observed are moving much faster than predicted by the Gravitational Law. If classical physics holds this can only be attributed to the presence of dark matter”, Manuel Metz states.

Or one must assume that some basic fundamental principles of physics have hitherto been incorrectly understood. “The only solution would be to reject Newton´s classical theory of gravitation”, says Pavel Kroupa. “We probably live in a non-Newton universe. If this is true, then our observations could be explained without dark matter”. Such approaches are finding support amongst other research teams in Europe, too.

It would not be the first time that Newton’s theory of gravitation had to be modified over the past hundred years. This became necessary in three special cases: when high velocities are involved (through the Special Theory of Relativity), in the proximity of large masses (through the theory of General Relativity), and on sub-atomic scales (through quantum mechanics).

The deviations detected in the satellite galaxy data support the hypothesis that in space where extremely weak accelerations predominate, a “modified Newton dynamic” must be adopted. This conclusion has far-reaching consequences for fundamental physics in general, and also for cosmological theories. ¬¬Famous astrophysicist Bob Sanders from the University of Groningen declares: "The authors of this paper make a strong argument. Their result is entirely consistent with the expectations of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND), but completely opposite to the predictions of the dark matter hypothesis. Rarely is an observational test so definite."

More information:

Metz, Manuel; Kroupa, Pavel; Theis, Christian; Hensler, Gerhard; Jerjen, Helmut: Did the Milky Way dwarf satellites enter the halo as a group? (The Astrophysical Journal 2009; doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/269)

Metz, Manuel; Kroupa, Pavel; Jerjen, Helmut: Discs of Satellites: the new dwarf spheroidals (Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2009; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14489.x)

Source: Bonn University