O relatório do IPCC para as Nações Unidas sobre o degelo do Himalaia foi baseado em dissertação de mestrado e artigo de revista

Gente, eu queria ver a cara dos defensores histéricos do aquecimento global, especialmente do Marcelo Leite, da Folha de São Paulo, ao saberem de mais esta revelação:

UN climate change panel based claims on student dissertation and magazine article

The United Nations' expert panel on climate change based claims about ice disappearing from the world's mountain tops on a student's dissertation and an article in a mountaineering magazine.

By Richard Gray, Science Correspondent and Rebecca Lefort
Published: 9:00PM GMT 30 Jan 2010

Officials were forced earlier this month to retract inaccurate claims in the IPCC's report about the melting of Himalayan glaciers Photo: GETTY

The revelation will cause fresh embarrassment for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which had to issue a humiliating apology earlier this month over inaccurate statements about global warming. 

The IPCC's remit is to provide an authoritative assessment of scientific evidence on climate change.

In its most recent report, it stated that observed reductions in mountain ice in the Andes, Alps and Africa was being caused by global warming, citing two papers as the source of the information.

However, it can be revealed that one of the sources quoted was a feature article published in a popular magazine for climbers which was based on anecdotal evidence from mountaineers about the changes they were witnessing on the mountainsides around them.

The other was a dissertation written by a geography student, studying for the equivalent of a master's degree, at the University of Berne in Switzerland that quoted interviews with mountain guides in the Alps.

The revelations, uncovered by The Sunday Telegraph, have raised fresh questions about the quality of the information contained in the report, which was published in 2007.

It comes after officials for the panel were forced earlier this month to retract inaccurate claims in the IPCC's report about the melting of Himalayan glaciers.

Sceptics have seized upon the mistakes to cast doubt over the validity of the IPCC and have called for the panel to be disbanded.

This week scientists from around the world leapt to the defence of the IPCC, insisting that despite the errors, which they describe as minor, the majority of the science presented in the IPCC report is sound and its conclusions are unaffected.

But some researchers have expressed exasperation at the IPCC's use of unsubstantiated claims and sources outside of the scientific literature.

Professor Richard Tol, one of the report's authors who is based at the Economic and Social Research Institute in Dublin, Ireland, said: "These are essentially a collection of anecdotes.

"Why did they do this? It is quite astounding. Although there have probably been no policy decisions made on the basis of this, it is illustrative of how sloppy Working Group Two (the panel of experts within the IPCC responsible for drawing up this section of the report) has been.

"There is no way current climbers and mountain guides can give anecdotal evidence back to the 1900s, so what they claim is complete nonsense."

...

Read more here/Leia mais aqui: The Telegraph

+++++

NOTA CAUSTICANTE DESTE BLOGGER:

Se Marcelo Leite, jornalista de renome da Folha de São Paulo defende ardorosamente uma ciência fajuta dessas do IPCC, será que os leitores podem confiar na editoria de ciência deste jornal que se recusa há uma década em publicar (com o resto da Grande Mídia) as insuficiências fundamentais da teoria geral da evolução no contexto de justificação teórica? Que jornalismo científico objetivo é este que até agora nada publicou sobre a nova teoria geral da evolução - a SÍNTESE EVOLUTIVA MODERNA, quando meio mundo já sabe disso?

A FOLHA DE SÃO PAULO é um jornal que os leitores podem deixar de ler sem nenhuma falta, sem prejuízo algum. Muito pelo contrário, a FSP está vendendo gato por lebre, oops, ideologia por ciência...