A questão elusiva dos íntrons - Parte 2-6

segunda-feira, janeiro 25, 2010

Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes

Alexei Fedorov*,
Amir Feisal Merican*,†, and
Walter Gilbert*,‡

-Author Affiliations
*Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138; and †Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Asia

Contributed by Walter Gilbert

Abstract

We purge large databases of animal, plant, and fungal intron-containing genes to a 20% similarity level and then identify the most similar animal–plant, animal–fungal, and plant–fungal protein pairs. We identify the introns in each BLAST 2.0 alignment and score matched intron positions and slid (near-matched, within six nucleotides) intron positions automatically. Overall we find that 10% of the animal introns match plant positions, and a further 7% are “slides.” Fifteen percent of fungal introns match animal positions, and 13% match plant positions. Furthermore, the number of alignments with high numbers of matches deviates greatly from the Poisson expectation. The 30 animal–plant alignments with the highest matches (for which 44% of animal introns match plant positions) when aligned with fungal genes are also highly enriched for triple matches: 39% of the fungal introns match both animal and plant positions. This is strong evidence for ancestral introns predating the animal–plant–fungal divergence, and in complete opposition to any expectations based on random insertion. In examining the slid introns, we show that at least half are caused by imperfections in the alignments, and are most likely to be actual matches at common positions. Thus, our final estimates are that ≈14% of animal introns match plant positions, and that ≈17–18% of fungal introns match animal or plant positions, all of these being likely to be ancestral in the eukaryotes.
exon   phase distribution  evolution  eukaryote
prokaryote

Footnotes

↵ ‡ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:gilbert@nucleus.harvard.edu.
Abbreviations:

EID, Exon–Intron Database
Copyright © 2002, The National Academy of Sciences

+++++

PDF gratuito do artigo aqui.