Fossil whale preservation implies high diatom accumulation rate in the Miocene–Pliocene Pisco Formation of Peru
Leonard R. Brand*1, Raúl Esperante*2, Arthur V. Chadwick*3, Orlando Poma Porras*4 and Merling Alomía*4
Leonard R. Brand*1, Raúl Esperante*2, Arthur V. Chadwick*3, Orlando Poma Porras*4 and Merling Alomía*4
Author Affiliations
1Department of Natural Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California 92350, USA
2Geoscience Research Institute, Loma Linda, California 92350, USA
3Biology Department, Southwestern Adventist University, Keene, Texas 76059, USA
4 Universidad Peruana Unión, Carretera Central, km. 19, Ñaña, Lima, Peru
Abstract
Diatomaceous deposits in the Miocene–Pliocene Pisco Formation contain abundant whales preserved in pristine condition (bones articulated or at least closely associated), in some cases including preserved baleen. The well-preserved whales indicate rapid burial. The 346 whales within ∼1.5 km2 of surveyed surface were not buried as an event, but were distributed uninterrupted through an 80-m-thick sedimentary section. The diatomaceous sediment lacks repeating primary laminations, but instead is mostly massive, with irregular laminations and speckles. There is no evidence for bioturbation by invertebrates in the whale-bearing sediment. Current depositional models do not account for the volume of diatomaceous sediments or the taphonomic features of the whales. These taphonomic and sedimentary features suggest that rapid burial due to high diatom accumulation, in part by lateral advection into protected, shallow embayments, is responsible for the superb preservation of these whales, leading to a higher upper limit on phytoplankton accumulation rates than previously documented.
taphonomy, diatoms, Pisco Formation, Miocene, Pliocene, Cetacea, sedimentation rates
Footnotes
Accepted November 10, 2003.
Received August 1, 2003.
Revision received October 29, 2003.
Geological Society of America
+++++
+++++
FREE PDF GRATIS Dr. Leonard Brand personal University website