A síntese evolutiva estendida: um exame histórico e filosófico integrado

The extended evolutionary synthesis: An integrated historical and philosophical examination

Yafeng Shan

First published: 12 June 2024
https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.13002

 

 

Image/Imagem: Cambridge University

Abstract

Among biologists and philosophers, there is an ongoing debate over the Modern Synthesis and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. Some argue that our current evolutionary biology is in need of (at least) some substantial revision or nontrivial extension, while others maintain that the Modern Synthesis remains the foundational framework for evolutionary biology. It has been widely debated whether the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis provides a more promising framework than the Modern Synthesis. The nature and methodological implications of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis were also examined. This paper offers an integrated historical and philosophical examination of the debate over the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. It reviews the development of evolutionary biology of the twentieth century. It argues that there are substantial conceptual and theoretical differences between the Modern Synthesis and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, but they are not incommensurable paradigms in the Kuhnian sense. It also argues for a functional approach to the debate over these two frameworks of evolutionary theory.
 

FREE PDF GRATIS: Philosophy Compass

Um relato unificado das variedades do Darwinismo: explicação, lógica e cosmovisão

The Varieties of Darwinism: Explanation, Logic, and Worldview

Hugh Desmond, André Ariew, Philippe Huneman, and Thomas Reydon

 

 

Image/Imagem

Abstract

Ever since its inception, the theory of evolution has been reified into an “-ism”: Darwinism. Although biologists today, by and large, do not use the term “Darwinism” in their research, it still enjoys currency in broader academic and societal contexts. “Darwinian approaches” proliferate across the sciences and humanities and, in public discourse, various so-called “Darwinian views on life” are perceived to have ethically and politically laden consequences. What exactly is Darwinism, and how precisely are its nonscientific uses related to the scientific theory of evolution? Some claim the term’s meaning should be limited to scientific content, yet others call for its abolition altogether. In this paper, we propose a unified account of these varieties of Darwinism. We show how the theories introduced by Darwin have grounded a “logic” or style of reasoning about phenomena, as well as various ethically and politically charged “worldviews.” The full meaning of Darwinism, as well as how this meaning has changed over time, can only be understood through the complex interaction between these dimensions.

Subscription or payment needed/Requer assinatura ou pagamento:  

The Quarterly Review of Biology

Free preprint/Pré-impressão gratuita: PhilSci Archive