Datação de radiocarbono de alta precisão mostra uma colonização humana inicial e rápida da Polinésia Leste

segunda-feira, janeiro 03, 2011

High-precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid initial human colonization of East Polynesia

Janet M. Wilmshurst a,1, Terry L. Hunt b, Carl P. Lipo c, and Atholl J. Anderson d

-Author Affiliations

aLandcare Research, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand;
bDepartment of Anthropology, University of Hawai'i-Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822;
cDepartment of Anthropology and IIRMES, California State University, Long Beach, CA 90840; and
dSchool of Culture, History and Language, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia

Edited* by James O'Connell, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, and approved November 22, 2010 (received for review October 27, 2010)

Abstract

The 15 archipelagos of East Polynesia, including New Zealand, Hawaii, and Rapa Nui, were the last habitable places on earth colonized by prehistoric humans. The timing and pattern of this colonization event has been poorly resolved, with chronologies varying by >1000 y, precluding understanding of cultural change and ecological impacts on these pristine ecosystems. In a meta-analysis of 1,434 radiocarbon dates from the region, reliable short-lived samples reveal that the colonization of East Polynesia occurred in two distinct phases: earliest in the Society Islands A.D. ∼1025–1120, four centuries later than previously assumed; then after 70–265 y, dispersal continued in one major pulse to all remaining islands A.D. ∼1190–1290. We show that previously supported longer chronologies have relied upon radiocarbon-dated materials with large sources of error, making them unsuitable for precise dating of recent events. Our empirically based and dramatically shortened chronology for the colonization of East Polynesia resolves longstanding paradoxes and offers a robust explanation for the remarkable uniformity of East Polynesian culture, human biology, and language. Models of human colonization, ecological change and historical linguistics for the region now require substantial revision.

Footnotes

1To whom correspondence should be addressed. 

E-mail:Wilmshurstj@landcareresearch.co.nz.

Author contributions: J.M.W., T.L.H., C.P.L., and A.J.A. designed research, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

↵*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.

This article contains supporting information online at 

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

+++++