Cientistas do Climategate inocentados: esprit de corps ou I'll get by with a little help from my friend???

segunda-feira, julho 12, 2010

OPINION

JULY 12, 2010

The Climategate Whitewash Continues

Global warming alarmists claim vindication after last year's data manipulation scandal. Don't believe the 'independent' reviews.

By PATRICK J. MICHAELS

Last November there was a world-wide outcry when a trove of emails were released suggesting some of the world's leading climate scientists engaged in professional misconduct, data manipulation and jiggering of both the scientific literature and climatic data to paint what scientist Keith Briffa called "a nice, tidy story" of climate history. The scandal became known as Climategate.

Now a supposedly independent review of the evidence says, in effect, "nothing to see here." Last week "The Independent Climate Change E-mails Review," commissioned and paid for by the University of East Anglia, exonerated the University of East Anglia. The review committee was chaired by Sir Muir Russell, former vice chancellor at the University of Glasgow.

Muir Russell - AP

Mr. Russell took pains to present his committee, which consisted of four other academics, as independent. He told the Times of London that "Given the nature of the allegations it is right that someone who has no links to either the university or the climate science community looks at the evidence and makes recommendations based on what they find."

No links? One of the panel's four members, Prof. Geoffrey Boulton, was on the faculty of East Anglia's School of Environmental Sciences for 18 years. At the beginning of his tenure, the Climatic Research Unit (CRU)—the source of the Climategate emails—was established in Mr. Boulton's school at East Anglia. Last December, Mr. Boulton signed a petition declaring that the scientists who established the global climate records at East Anglia "adhere to the highest levels of professional integrity."

This purportedly independent review comes on the heels of two others—one by the University of East Anglia itself and the other by Penn State University, both completed in the spring, concerning its own employee, Prof. Michael Mann. Mr. Mann was one of the Climategate principals who proposed a plan, which was clearly laid out in emails whose veracity Mr. Mann has not challenged, to destroy a scientific journal that dared to publish three papers with which he and his East Anglia friends disagreed. These two reviews also saw no evil. For example, Penn State "determined that Dr. Michael E. Mann did not engage in, nor did he participate in, directly or indirectly, any actions that seriously deviated from accepted practices within the academic community."
...

Read more here/Leia mais aqui: The Wall Street Journal

+++++

Mr. Michaels, a professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia from 1980-2007, is now a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

+++++

NOTA CAUSTICANTE DESTE BLOGGER:

Minha mãe dizia que pimenta nos olhos dos outros era refresco. As investigações independentes nao foram atrás do que realmente aconteceu com os cientistas negacionistas e as ações sugeridas pelos cientistas desonestos contra os críticos e oponentes do aquecimento global ser antropogenicamente provocado. Eles não viram as falcatruas patentes encontradas em milhares de e-mails. O nome disso é corporativismo com todas as letras. Traduzindo em graúdos: I'll get by with a little help from my friends (Beatles):



Eu acredito na inocência dessa turma, assim como creio na virgindade das prostitutas [com todo o respeito] que são mais éticas com seus clientes do que esses cientistas Barnabés pagos com o nosso suado dinheirinho dos impostos e que se imaginam estar acima da lei.

+++++

Vote neste blog para o prêmio TOPBLOG 2010.