Detroitosaurus wrecks, um novo fóssil???

quinta-feira, junho 04, 2009

Detroitosaurus wrecks? Um novo fóssil de dinossauro a la Tiranossauro rex? Não, é o título de uma reportagem no The Economist sobre o colapso econômico da General Motors.

SPC [Só pra contrariar]: O Darwinosaurus wrecks está previsto para 2010. Quem viver, verá...

+++++

The decline and fall of General Motors

Detroitosaurus wrecks

Jun 4th 2009

From The Economist print edition

The lessons for America and the car industry from the biggest industrial collapse ever

THE demise of GM had been expected for so long that when it finally died there was barely a whimper. Wall Street was unmoved. Congress did not draw breath. America shrugged. Yet the indifference with which the news was received should not obscure its importance. A company which once sold half the cars in America, employed in its various guises as many people as the combined populations of Nevada and Delaware and was regarded as a model for managers all over the world has just gone under; and its collapse holds important lessons about management, about government and about the future of the car industry (see article, article).



Government and GM: a fatal mixture

GM’s architect, Alfred Sloan, never had Henry Ford’s entrepreneurial or technical genius, but he had organisation. He designed his company around the needs of his customers (“a car for every purse and purpose”). The divisional structure he created in the 1920s, with professional managers reporting to a head office through strict financial monitoring, was adopted by other titans of American business, such as GE, Dupont and IBM before the model spread across the rich world.

Although this model was brilliantly designed for domination, when the environment changed it proved disastrously inflexible. The problem in the 1970s was not really the arrival of better, smaller, lighter Japanese cars; it was GM’s failure to respond in kind. Rather than hitting back with superior products, the company hid behind politicians who appeared to help it in the short term. Rules on fuel economy distorted the market because they had a loophole for pickups and other light trucks—a sop to farmers and tool-toting artisans. The American carmakers exploited that by producing squadrons of SUVs, while the government restricted the import of small, efficient Japanese cars. If Detroit had spent less time lobbying for government protection and more on improving its products it might have fared better. Sensible fuel taxes would have hurt for a while, but unlike market-distorting fuel-efficiency rules, they would have forced GM to evolve.

+++++

Read more here/Leia mais aqui.